Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4000 words

Over the top Compulsive Disorder (OCD) - Essay Example Because an individual completes ceremonial activities or stresses on occasion doesn't really imply that he/she experiences OCD. Remember that a conduct is viewed as a turmoil just when it begins to meddle with one's day by day life - expending each part of it and weakening an individual's capacity to perform standard capacities (e.g., working, setting up great relational connections). A mother who twofold checks her youngster's seat strap more than once before beginning her vehicle doesn't consequently experience the ill effects of OCD on the grounds that a conduct was rehashed. Interestingly, an OCD patient may spend between hours to even a whole day agonizing over something or potentially considering approaches to keep terrible things from happening. Despite the fact that OCD patients know that their lives are being upset, they experience issues controlling these problematic considerations and practices (Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, 2005). They realize that these musings and activities are not ordinary but rather they can't stop them. This is the thing that separates these kinds of dull contemplations and activities from customary ceremonies that individuals perform to guarantee request, tidiness, and security (e.g., checking for bolted entryways, orchestrating records one after another in order for simpler access). There is a craving from the individual to fr ee himself of these contemplations and practices, yet this longing is overruled by his fixations and impulses. Concurring t According to the American Psychiatric Association's Fact Sheet on OCD (2005), a few side effects may incorporate yet are not constrained to the accompanying: cleaning, for example, tedious washing or failure to hold door handles; masterminding and sorting out, needing everything in a specific request constantly; mental impulses, for example, quietly saying expressions or supplications to self; storing and gathering different things, for example, magazines and papers, shaping heaps; and continued checking, conceivably remembering driving courses. Foa and Steketee (as refered to in Hilgard, 1953) found that the most widely recognized impulses among the rundown are washing and checking. Quite often, these activities are completed as a result of uncertainty. OCD patients consistently imagine that something terrible will occur and don't to depend on their faculties alone. At the rear of their brains, they accept that there are consistently things that they can't see (or predict). For instance, an individual with OCD may consistently accept that germs are consistently there regardless of continued washing, or he may feel that he neglected to turn a machine off much in the wake of checking the switch various occasions. Rachman and Hodgson just as Stern and Cobb presumed that these patients are concerned for the most part about: finishing assignments, forestalling hurt (self as well as other people), and contracting disease from germs (Hilgard, 1953). In the film More or less Good, Nicholson's character is a genuine case of a patient experiencing Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. He drearily washes his hands, each time with an alternate bar of cleanser. It requires some investment for him to at long last stop this hand-washing meeting. His cupboards were loaded up with a ceaseless gracefully of cleansers to suit this impulse. Albeit apparently extraordinary, numerous OCD patients display practices that are past typical (maybe much more articulated than in this model), which shows that the turmoil may truly turn into an obstacle to ordinary working, particularly when the customs take over a large portion of their time and exertion, denying them of time to do

National Language Essay Example For Students

Confidence Interval for a Mean When We Know Sigma

Certainty Interval for a Mean When We Know Sigma In inferential measurements, one of the significant objectives is to appraise anâ unknownâ populationâ parameter. You start with a factual example, and from this, you can decide a scope of qualities for the parameter. This scope of qualities is known as a certainty span. Certainty Intervals Certainty stretches are for the most part like each other in a couple of ways. To begin with, numerous two-sided certainty stretches have a similar structure: Gauge  ± Margin of Error Second, the means for figuring certainty spans are fundamentally the same as, paying little heed to the sort of certainty stretch you are attempting to discover. The particular kind of certainty stretch that will be analyzed beneath is a two-sided certainty span for a populace mean when you know the populace standard deviation. Additionally, accept that you are working with a populace that is ordinarily appropriated. Certainty Interval for a Mean With a Known Sigma The following is a procedure to locate the ideal certainty stretch. Albeit the entirety of the means are significant, the first is especially so: Check conditions: Begin by guaranteeing that the conditions for your certainty stretch have been met. Accept that you know the estimation of the populace standard deviation, indicated by the Greek letter sigma ÏÆ'. Likewise, expect a typical distribution.Calculate gauge: Estimate the populace parameter-for this situation, the populace mean-by utilization of a measurement, which in this issue is the example mean. This includes framing a basic arbitrary example from the populace. Here and there, you can assume that your example is a basic irregular example, regardless of whether it doesn't meet the exacting definition.Critical esteem: Obtain the basic worth z* that relates with your certainty level. These qualities are found by counseling a table of z-scores or by utilizing the product. You can utilize a z-score table since you know the estimation of the populace standard deviation, and you expect that the populace is regularly conveyed. Normal basic qualities are 1.645 for a 90-perce nt certainty level, 1.960 for a 95-percent certainty level, and 2.576 for a 99-percent certainty level. Room for mistakes: Calculate the wiggle room z* ÏÆ'/√n, where n is the size of the basic irregular example that you formed.Conclude: Finish by assembling the gauge and safety buffer. This can be communicated as either Estimate  ± Margin of Error or as Estimate - Margin of Error to Estimate Margin of Error. Make certain to unmistakably express the degree of certainty that is joined to your certainty stretch. Model To perceive how you can develop a certainty stretch, work through a model. Assume you realize that the IQ scores of all approaching school first year recruit are typically circulated with standard deviation of 15. You have a straightforward arbitrary example of 100 green beans, and the mean IQ score for this example is 120. Locate a 90-percent certainty span for the mean IQ score for the whole populace of approaching school first year recruits. Work through the means that were sketched out above: Check conditions: The conditions have been met since you have been informed that the populace standard deviation is 15 and that you are managing an ordinary distribution.Calculate gauge: You have been informed that you have a straightforward irregular example of size 100. The mean IQ for this example is 120, so this is your estimate.Critical esteem: The basic incentive for certainty level of 90 percent is given by z* 1.645.Margin of blunder: Use the safety buffer equation and get a mistake ofâ z* ÏÆ'/√n (1.645)(15)/√(100) 2.467.Conclude: Conclude by assembling everything. A 90-percent certainty stretch for the population’s mean IQ score is 120  ± 2.467. On the other hand, you could express this certainty stretch as 117.5325 to 122.4675. Down to earth Considerations Certainty timespans above sort are not sensible. It is uncommon to know the populace standard deviation yet not have a clue about the populace mean. There are ways that this ridiculous suspicion can be evacuated. While you have accepted an ordinary appropriation, this suspicion doesn't have to hold. Decent examples, which show no solid skewness or have any anomalies, alongside an enormous enough example size, permit you to conjure as far as possible hypothesis. Subsequently, you are advocated in utilizing a table of z-scores, in any event, for populaces that are not regularly conveyed.

International logistics Level 2 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Global coordinations Level 2 - Essay Example It likewise involves the proficiency of in-process account, total items, just as data that identifies with the last utilization by the buyers from the purpose of creation of the consumable merchandise. The activities of the organization in the fulfillment of vision and mission depend vigorously on the ecological area. For example, exceptional contemplations are made for the silver town Refinery’s upstream supplies chain and the following level downstream with respect to the reestablished calculated procedures. The consummation of strategic procedures underway and conveyance of the items is increasingly fruitful when the organization can address a scope of difficulties that are ordinarily confronted. There is additionally a requirement for change appropriation to improve the endurance estimations of the Tate and Lyle association in Britain. Nonetheless, requirements for change have been wildly experienced and are a plentiful factor for address. The ongoing improvements in the a ssociation involve the usage of gracefully chain the board techniques with a goal of countering each type of authoritative antagonism. The best models of gracefully chain need be used in the calculated procedures the board to guarantee association similarity with the info methodologies (Plunkett, 2007). The conversation in this paper builds up the key factors that impact the calculated procedures at Tate and Lyle. The cognizance of these elements will be helped by leading an exceptional review on the Silver town Refinery’s upstream supplies chain and the following level downstream. ID of the scope of difficulties that Tate and Lyle must address is additionally viewed as imperative at this point and the diverse calculated exercises inside the gracefully chain. It is likewise significant to explore into the degree of progress of exercises at Tate and Lyle could change and compels for change that are significantly experienced. Key factors that impact the calculated procedures at Tate and Lyle Logistical procedures at Tate and Lyle are greatly affected by overpowering variables that are esteemed critical as progress or disappointment drivers. The most pivotal and long haul factor is the authoritative hardware that is used in the execution of the necessary procedures. The plant is settled in plentiful destinations that follow each other to achieve a successive procedure. The area of a principle plant at Silver town is considered as an upstream space for the primary creation of the required finished results, while the downstream levels are considered as consecutive plants that improve the created merchandise conveyance to the last client. Each association upstream settings decide the accomplishment of the downstream levels and the last item conveyances. In this way, the Tate and lyre calculated procedures execution are exceptionally controlled by the operational hardware in the set up plant. Furthermore, the operational similarity is a drawn out factor that i mpacts strategic procedures. The Tate and Lyle being a food organization has operational

Zeus Essay -- essays research papers

Zeus was the child of Cronus and Rhea, a prior race of administering divine beings called Titans. Cronus was lord of the considerable number of Titans. Zeus was the sibling of Hades and Poseidon, Hades was the lord of the black market and Poseidon was the lord of the ocean. Together they ousted their dad and the remainder of the Titans. All thanks was because of Zeus for the dethrowning of Cronus. Before cronus ever had youngsters he heard a prediction that one of his offsprings would topple him, so at whatever point his better half would have a youngster he would swallow it. At that point, after he had gulped numerous infants, she brought forth Zeus. She became extremely partial to him, until Cronus called her to give him the infant so he could swallow it. She concealed Zeus in a cavern, and she gave Cronus a stone enclosed by material. he gulped it entire simply like different infants. Throughout the years Zeus developed more grounded and more astute. At that point, when everything looked good he defied his dad and kicked him in the stomach. The stun from this made Cronus upchuck the divine beings, which were all completely developed at this point. Zeus and his kindred divine beings ousted Cronus and the Titans. Zeus what's more, his siblings concluded who might manage over what- Zeus...god of the sky Poseidon...god of the ocean Hades...god of the black market All the divine beings shared the earth together. In the entirety of Zeus' photos he is delineated with a facial hair and muscles. He's likewise for the most part holding a lighting jolt. Zeus wedded Hera, whom was likewise his sister. He camouflaged...

Finding a Professional Custom Essay Writing Service

Finding a Professional Custom Essay Writing ServiceIf you are looking for a professional custom essay writing service that can turn your assignments into a hot favorite in school, there are a few things you need to know. Just because you can get an assignment from a service, that doesn't mean that you are going to be writing the assignment from scratch. It is important to understand that the goal of any custom essay writing service is to find the best writing and then revise it to fit your requirements. This is different from getting a workbook or academic essay from a computer that has already been formatted and approved.The very first thing you want to do is to go over the rules of the essay writing service that you are considering. Most of these companies will have a set number of rules they ask for their clients to follow and those rules are to write a variety of assignments for them. They will then write different types of essays that fall under each topic. They will then ask fo r feedback about how well they did for you so they can continue to keep up the pace of your assignments.The typical custom essay writing service will take on several different types of projects, such as business, leadership, poetry, etc. You will be given the assignment and they will begin by checking over the work to make sure you did a good job. The assignment might contain several different sections, but they will make sure to follow the format of the job that you have assigned them to do.Many business schools across the country create essays to test their students in areas like communicating with others, decision making, market research, etc. You may also need to find an essay that addresses a certain business issue. For example, if you are interviewing executives for a position in your organization, you will need a business essay that deals with your position and how they will fit into the organization.There is no such thing as general ideas. These generally come later in the p rocess. When you are a writer, you may feel comfortable with having several different topics to write about. That is a great way to make progress, but as soon as you start to get more involved, you will need to make sure that you are moving with one of the many writing services that are available.You can expect to be challenged with the types of assignments that the custom essay writing service has prepared for you. You will also be made aware of the time frame that you have for completing your assignments. When you have submitted a paper for one of these services, you will be able to decide how much time you can spend on it and what you want to work on after that.This means that you will be given an outline of the essay and what you need to do to complete it. The length will vary between one page and two hundred pages. The more time you have to write the paper and edit it, the better.If you are thinking about entering college, you may find that the next step is to get a custom essa y writing service. This will give you the opportunity to show off your writing skills and get noticed. Once you are writing quality essays, you can start to make big changes in your life, whether it is by going to graduate school or finding a good job.

Embryonic Stem Cells Is Immoral - Free Essay Example

Therapeutic Cloning to Obtain Embryonic Stem Cells Is Immoral The point is to cause each of us to think deeply about whether there is any essential difference between the reality of [World War II] Nazi experiments and therapeutic cloning. In this two-part viewpoint, David A. Prentice and William Saunders discuss the science and the ethics of therapeutic cloning. In the first part, Prentice argues that creating clones for the purpose of embryonic stem cell research, called therapeutic cloning, is no different from reproductive cloning, which creates a living human child. Also, he points out, therapeutic cloning is not therapeutic for the embryo. In the second part of the viewpoint, Saunders builds on Prentices argument and goes even further. He argues that therapeutic cloning is really no different than the horrific experiments performed by the Nazis during World War II. Saunders notes that supporters of embryonic stem cell research contend that the research is beneficial to human kind; however, Saunders argues, the Nazis used this same reasoning to justify research on the mentally ill, the disabled, and the feeble-minded. Prentice and Saunders are senior fellows at the Family Research Council, a conservative Christian think tank and lobbying organization. As you read, consider the following questions: 1. Why does Prentice claim that therapeutic cloning will lead to reproductive cloning? 2. What was the point of the Nuremberg Code, according to Saunders? 3. Why does Saunders say that therapeutic cloning violates the Nuremberg Code? Part I Cloning always starts with an embryo. The most common technique proposed for human cloning is called somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). This cloning is accomplished by transferring the nucleus from a human somatic (body) cell into an egg cell which has had its chromosomes removed or inactivated. SCNT produces a human embryo who is virtually genetically identical to an existing or previously existing human being. Pro ponents of human cloning hold out two hopes for its use: (1) the creation of children for infertile couples (so-called reproductive cloning), and (2) the development of medical miracles to cure diseases by harvesting embryonic stem cells from the cloned embryos of patients (euphemistically termed therapeutic cloning). All Human Cloning Produces a Human Being All human cloning is reproductive. It creates—reproduces—a new, developing human intended to be virtually identical to the cloned subject. Both reproductive cloning and therapeutic cloning use exactly the same technique to create the clone, and the cloned embryos are indistinguishable. The process, as well as the product, is identical. The clone is created as a new, single-cell embryo and grown in the laboratory for a few days. Then it is either implanted in the womb of a surrogate mother (reproductive cloning) or destroyed to harvest its embryonic stem cells for experiments (therapeutic cloning). It is the s ame embryo, used for different purposes. In fact, the cloned embryo at that stage of development cannot be distinguished under the microscope from an embryo created by fertilization joining egg and sperm. Trying to call a cloned embryo something other than an embryo is not accurate or scientific. Biologically and genetically speaking, what is created is a human being; its species is Homo sapiens. It is neither fish nor fowl, neither monkey nor cow—it is human. Created in Order to Be Destroyed Therapeutic cloning is obviously not therapeutic for the embryo. The new human is specifically created in order to be destroyed as a source of tissue [, as Robert P. Lanza and colleagues report in a 2000 JAMA article]: [Therapeutic cloning] requires the deliberate creation and disaggregation of a human embryo. Most cloned embryos do not even survive one week, to the blastocyst stage, when they are destroyed in the process of harvesting their cells. Experiments with lab animals show that even these early embryos have abnormalities in genetic expression. Beyond the abnormalities caused by the cloning procedure, embryonic stem cells from cloned embryos will still face problems for their use, including the tendency to form tumors, and significant difficulties in getting the cells to form the correct tissue and function normally. Therapeutic Cloning Leads to Reproductive Cloning Because there is no difference in the nuclear transfer technique or the cloned embryo, allowing therapeutic cloning experimentation to proceed will inevitably lead to reproductive cloning. The technique can be practiced and huge numbers of cloned embryos produced. In fact, the lead scientist of the South Korean team that first cloned human embryos in February 2004 in a press conference on their experiments that the cloning technique developed in their laboratory cannot be separated from reproductive cloning. His statement affirms what others have pointed out before: allowing therapeutic cloning simply prepares the way for reproductive cloning. Human cloning is unsafe and unnecessary. There are no valid or compelling grounds—scientific or medical—to proceed. A comprehensive ban on human cloning is the only sufficient answer. Part II As Dr. Prentice has shown, cloning indisputably destroys innocent human life. This basic truth should lead the world to reject human cloning. However, in an effort to extricate human cloning from this ethical vise grip, its supporters attempt to draw a distinction between human life, which begins at conception, and human personhood, which begins only at their say-so. Unfortunately, the arbitrary denial of personhood to human beings has a long and cruel history. The Nuremberg Code, formulated in the years after World War II, is particularly instructive with regard to the current debate on human cloning. For instance, when the principal author of the report on human cloning issued by the National Academy of Sciences te stified before the Presidents Council on Bioethics, he stated that reproductive cloning would violate the Nuremberg Code: The Nuremberg Code, with which I am in full agreement, outlines those kinds of things you would not simply [do] for the sake of knowledge that involve human subjects. The Nuremberg Code The Nuremberg Code is a body of ethical norms enunciated by the Nuremberg Tribunal, which, after World War II, had the responsibility of judging the actions of the Nazis and their allies. The point of the code was to restate and apply the established ethical norms of the civilized world. Nazis Deemed Some Life Unworthy Nazi laws had defined Jews and other undesirables as non-persons. Eventually, between six and nine million of these undesirables were sent to extermination camps and killed. However, before the killing in the camps began, the Nazis had engaged in an extensive campaign of euthanasia against the mentally and physically handicapped, which not only foreshadowed but also prepared the way for the extermination camps. In his book The Nazi Doctors, Robert Jay Lifton draws our attention to a book titled The Permission to Destroy Life Unworthy of Life, written during the campaign. Lifton writes: [It was] published in 1920 and written jointly by two German professors: the jurist Karl Binding and Alfred Hoche, professor of psychiatry at the University of Freiburg. Carefully argued in the numbered-paragraph form of the traditional philosophical treatise, the book included as unworthy life not only the incurably ill but large segments of the mentally ill, the feeble-minded, and retarded and deformed children. T]he authors professionalized and medicalized the entire concept; destroying life unworthy of life was purely a healing treatment and a healing work. The Nazis were determined to cleanse the genetic pool to produce better Aryans. Nazi officials announced that under the direction of specialists all therapeutic possibilities will be administere d according to the latest scientific knowledge. The result of this therapeutic treatment of inferior lives was that eventually a network of some thirty killing areas within existing institutions was set up throughout Germany and in Austria and Poland. In their book, The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code, George Annas and Michael Grodin reveal that: At the same time that forced sterilization and abortion were instituted for individuals of inferior genetic stock, sterilization and abortion for healthy German women were declared illegal and punishable (in some cases by death) as a crime against the German body. As one might imagine, Jews and others deemed racially suspect were exempted from these restrictions. On November 10, 1938, a Luneberg court legalized abortion for Jews. A decree of June 23, 1943, allowed for abortions for Polish workers, but only if they were not judged racially valuable. Later, the Nazis created the extermination camps for the Jews and other inferior ra ces. In the camps, Nazi doctors engaged in cruel experiments on the Jews, Gypsies, Poles, and others. They exposed them to extreme cold to determine the temperature at which death would occur. They injected them with poisons to see how quickly certain lethal elements moved through the circulatory system. They subjected twins to all manner of disabling and brutal experiments to determine how genetically identical persons reacted to different conditions. Some of the experiments were nonetheless designed to preserve life—not of the subject, but of, for example, German pilots who were forced to parachute into freezing ocean waters. Everyone agrees the Nuremberg Code prohibits reproductive cloning. What relevance does it have for therapeutic cloning? If human embryos are human beings, then therapeutic cloning, which creates an embryo only to destroy it in the process of exploiting its stem cells, violates a cardinal principle of the Nuremberg Code: There is to be no experiment ation on a human subject when it is known that death or disabling injury will result. Regardless of the good that might be produced by such experiments, the experiments are of their very nature an immoral use of human beings. Subverting the Meaning of Healing Recall how the Nazis subverted the meaning of healing. Recall how they used the term therapeutic to describe not the helping of suffering people, but the killing of them. Recall that the Nazis eliminated those unworthy of life in order to improve the genetic stock of Germany. Recall how the Nazis undertook lethal experiments on concentration camp inmates in order, in some cases, to find ways to preserve the lives of others. The point is not to suggest that those who support therapeutic cloning are, in any sense, Nazis. Rather, the point is to cause each of us to think deeply about whether there is any essential difference between the reality of those Nazi experiments and therapeutic cloning. As we have shown, each case i nvolves a living human being, and that human being is killed in the aim of a perceived higher good. Cloning proponents try to distinguish between the two cases by saying that the cloned human being has no potential. But in each case, it is the actions of other human beings that rob the first of potential (in the first case, the actions of Nazi executioners; in the second, the laboratory technicians). In either case, the human subject is full of potential simply by being a living human being. Of course, almost miraculously, many of the inmates of the camps did survive when the allies rescued them. Equally miraculously, frozen embryos have been implanted in a womans womb and brought to live (and healthy) birth. As we have shown, every embryo is not merely potentially a life, but [is an] actual life, a human being from the first moment of existence. Furthermore, any living human embryo has the inherent potential to develop into a healthy baby. It is disingenuous for supporters of cl oning to claim the cloned human embryo is only potential life because they plan to mandate by law that it be destroyed before it can come to birth. Regardless of its location, the human embryo, by its nature, is full of potential, unless the actions of adult human beings deprive it of the opportunity to realize that potential. Guard Against Inhuman Acts [Russian author] Alexander Solzhenitsyn, a man who chronicled and suffered under another ideology that denied the dignity of each and every human being, observed, Gradually it was disclosed to me that the line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either, but right though every human heart, and through all human hearts. This line shifts. Inside us, it oscillates. Solzhenitsyn did not regard the perpetrators of brutal crimes in his own country as inhuman monsters. Rather, he saw the essential truth—they were human beings, engaged in immoral acts. They engag ed in those acts by dehumanizing the persons on whom their brutality was inflicted, and they did so in the name of (perhaps in the passionate belief in) a greater good. But Solzhenitsyn reminds us that, unless we are willing to admit that, for the best as well as for the worst of motives, we are also capable of inhuman acts, we will have no guard against committing them. No one is safe from brutality so long as we think that it is only inhuman others who are capable of inhuman acts. Rather, we will be secure when we are willing to look honestly at the objective reality of our acts, while realizing that we, too, are capable of acts that violate the inherent dignity of another, and refuse to engage in such acts despite the good we believe would result from doing otherwise. In the debate over the cloning and destruction of embryonic human beings, this essential truth must be our guide. FURTHER READINGS Books †¢Brian Alexander Rapture: How Biotech Became the New Religion. New Yo rk: Basic Books, 2003. Michael Bellomo The Stem Cell Divide: The Facts, the Fiction, and the Fear Driving the Greatest Scientific, Political, and Religious Debate of Our Time. New York: American Management Association, 2006. †¢Laura Black The Stem Cell Debate: The Ethics and Science Behind the Research. Berkeley Heights, NJ: Enslow, 2006. †¢Andrea L. Bonnicksen Crafting a Cloning Policy: From Dolly to Stem Cells. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002. †¢John Bryant, Linda Baggott la Velle, and John Searle Introduction to Bioethics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2005. †¢Eileen L. Daniel, ed. Taking Sides: Clashing Views in Health and Society. Dubuque, IA: McGraw-Hill, 2006. †¢Andrew Goliszek In the Name of Science: A History of Secret Programs, Medical Research, and Human Experimentation. New York: St. Martins, 2003. †¢Suzanne Holland, Karen Lebacqz, and Laurie Zoloth The Human Embryonic Stem Cell Debate: Science, Ethics, and Public Policy. Cambridg e, MA: MIT Press, 2001. †¢Judith A. Johnson and Erin D. Williams CRS Report for Congress: Stem Cell Research. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office, 2005. †¢Ann Kiessling Human Embryonic Stem Cells: An Introduction to the Science and Therapeutic Potential. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett, 2003. Helga Kuhse and Peter Singer, eds. Bioethics: An Anthology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006. †¢Robert Lanza et al, eds. Essentials of Stem Cell Biology. Boston: Academic, 2005. †¢Jane Maienschein Whose View of Life? Embryos, Cloning, and Stem Cells. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004. †¢Steven Paul McGiffen Biotechnology: Corporate Power Versus the Public Interest. Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto, 2005. †¢Jeff McMahan The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. †¢Chris Mooney The Republican War on Science. New York: Basic Books, 2005. †¢Jonathan Morris The Ethics of Biotechnology. Philadelph ia: Chelsea House, 2006. †¢National Research Council and Institute of Medicine Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2005. †¢Joseph Panno Stem Cell Research: Medical Applications and Ethical Controversy. New York: Facts On File, 2005. †¢Ann B. Parson The Proteus Effect: Stem Cells and Their Promise for Medicine. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry, 2004. †¢Presidents Council on Bioethics The Administrations Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research Funding Policy: Moral and Political Foundations. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office, 2003. Presidents Council on Bioethics Beyond Therapy: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office, 2003. †¢Bernard E. Rollin Science and Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. †¢Michael Ruse and Christopher A. Pynes The Stem Cell Controversy: Debating the Issues. Amherst, NY: Prometheus, 2003. †¢Albert Sas son Medical Biotechnology; Achievements, Prospects and Perceptions. New York: United Nations University Press, 2005. †¢Christopher Thomas Scott Stem Cells Now: From the Experiment That Shook the World to the New Politics of Life. New York: Pi, 2006. †¢George Patrick Smith The Christian Religion and Biotechnology: A Search for Principled Decision-Making. Norwell, MA: Springer, 2005. †¢Wesley Smith Consumers Guide to a Brave New World. San Francisco: Encounter, 2004. †¢Nancy E. Snow, ed. Stem Cell Research: New Frontiers in Science and Ethics. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2004. †¢Jennifer Viegas Stem Cell Research. New York: Rosen, 2003. †¢Brent Waters and Ronald Cole-Turner God and the Embryo: Religious Voices on Stem Cells and Cloning. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2003. Wendy Wagner and Rena Steinzor Rescuing Science from Politics: Regulation and the Distortion of Scientific Research. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. †¢Ian Wilmut and Roger Highfield After Dolly: The Uses and Misuses of Human Cloning. New York: Norton, 2006. Periodicals †¢Susan Kerr Bernal A Massive Snowball of Fraud and Deceit, Journal of Andrology, May/June 2006. †¢Alan Boyle Stem-Cell Pioneer Does a Reality Check, MSNBC. com. , June 22, 2005. www. msnbc. msn. com. †¢Malcom Byrnes and Jose Granados ANT-OAR Fails on All Counts, Science Theology News, July 13, 2006. Joe Carter Hype and Hypocrisy: Kinsley, IVF, and Embryo Destruction, Evangelical Outpost, July 10, 2006. †¢Michael Cook To Clone or Not to Clone, Mercatornet. com, December 6, 2005. www. mercatornet. com. †¢Rebecca Dresser Stem Cell Research, the Bigger Picture, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, Spring 2005. †¢Steven J. DuBord Heading for the Island, New American, August 22, 2005. †¢Robert P. George and Patrick Lee Acorns and Embryos, New Atlantis, Fall 2004/Winter 2005. †¢Nicholas Jackson Embryonic Stem C ell Research: Shades of the Third Reich, Sierra Times, June 27, 2005. Nancy L. Jones The Stem Cell Debate: Are Parthenogenic Human Embryos a Solution? Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity, June 2, 2003. www. cbhd. org. †¢Ann A. Kiessling What Is an Embryo? Connecticut Law Review, vol. 36, 2004. †¢Michael Kinsley False Dilemma on Stem Cells, Washington Post, July 7, 2006. †¢Paul R. McHugh Zygote and Clonote—the Ethical Use of Embryonic Stem Cells, New England Journal of Medicine, July 15, 2004. †¢Liza Mundy Souls on Ice: Americas Embryo Glut and the Wasted Promise of Stem Cell Research, MotherJones, July/August 2006. Jason Scott Robert The Science and Ethics of Making Part Human Animals in Stem Cell Biology, The FASEB Journal, 2006. †¢Wesley J. Smith Pro Life Challenge: Biomedical Ethics, the Radical Depth and Scope of the Cloning Agenda, National Right to Life News, January 2004. Source Citation: David A. Prentice and William Saunders. Therapeutic Cloning to Obtain Embryonic Stem Cells Is Immoral. Opposing Viewpoints: Stem Cells. Ed. Jacqueline Langwith. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Brisbane City Council Library Service. 19 May. 2010 .